Difference between revisions of "Talk:Photo Gallery"

(Comment provided by RossTarik - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 109: Line 109:
--[[User:RossTarik|RossTarik]] 19:25, 30 April 2011 (BST)
--[[User:RossTarik|RossTarik]] 19:25, 30 April 2011 (BST)
== Jamesm said ... ==
<div class='commentBlock'>
Only Billy would know how accurate they are, except perhaps Brunhilde Koye who [http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Witness_Testimony_Part_Two#Brunhilde_Koye_.2864.29.2C_ret._export_merchant saw Ptaah once].
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 22:13, 30 April 2011 (BST)

Revision as of 21:13, 30 April 2011

--Sanjin 02:22, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Hi, is it possible to make separate folders for different kind of pictures? It just looks unorderly when they are all thrown together.

Note: Some photos were doubles which I found so far when sorting in groups of fives --J-Truthseeker 16:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)


Hebrew Alphabet

I only glanced at it, but the Hebrew-Lyranic alphabetic-correspondential chart has at least 2 mistakes, namely that Orash & Emaph are given in Hebrew, although they have taken the functions of being final forms of the letters Mem (Memh) & Tzade (Xade), respectively. ם Mem Sofit (final Mem) looks like a square now, instead of a circle, & ץ Tzade Sofit (final Tzade) has turned its foot into a line, similarly to how the modern Yodh (Jedh) is now just a curved angle or 'flame', instead of an isosceles triangle.

  • Unthinkably, it was also omitted that Uheth is the same letter as the Hebrew ט Teth.


- Matthew


MarksmanR 10:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC) According to the approved, unnoficial translation of "Book of Symbols" by FIGU Canada, the following translations are different for what is posted here:

  • Abartigkeit: Perversity (instead of deviancy)
  • Ablehnung: Rejection (instead of disapproval)
  • Abscheu/Ekel: Revulsion/Disgust (instead of horror/disgust)
  • Ur-Absolutum: Ur-Absolutum ('Ur' not translated)
  • Mission/Aufgabe: Mission/Task
  • Bescheidenheit: Modesty (instead of selflessness)
  • Achtung/Respekt: Attention/Respect
  • Verbundenheit: Solidarity (instead of connection)
  • Wissen: Knowing (instead of knowledge)
  • Gewalt: Violence (a translation instead of remaining as 'Gewalt')
  • Pflicht: Duty (instead of obligation)
  • Freiheit: Liberty (instead of freedom)
  • Menschheit: Mankind (instead of humankind)

Should they be changed to match the FIGU Canada translations then?

neo korben said ...


--neo korben 08:41, 4 July 2010 (BST)

Zameen said ...

i communicated with hawaiian about chatting about his creational theories on a private chat page. will this get me kicked off this site? that would be the last thing i would ever want.

--Zameen 22:04, 30 August 2010 (BST)

Jamesm said ...

Zameen don't worry that was before I set the rules.

--Jamesm 22:21, 30 August 2010 (BST)

Hawaiian 22:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Zameen & Jamesm, thanks to both of you, the reasons why these theories need to be discussed privately before being posted are to first co-relate it with the High German materials, establish any links or connection(s), verify with FIGU for editing or/and screening, then after approval, post it here for the English speaking audience. It is to prevent confusion or the possibility of misleading anyone.

It is very critical to maintain a strict adherence to BEAM's work as a slightest deviation can have a drastic outcome. For instance, the correction of a translation from "possibilities" to "potentials" have not only open more "options", but triggered a basis for my main theory, which is "Equational Potentials", that if valid, will go much further than just one-dimensional.

BTW, FIGU has been monitoring Dretx Omega statements and got entertained somewhat!

Markvd said ...

That laser weapon and suit Alena sports is updated by now right. I think I would break out in laughter if they came and said something like put your hands up........................I would slowly pull out a much larger super soaker Earth water gun.:)

--Markvd 01:55, 31 August 2010 (BST)

DrBoogy said ...

After browsing this site for a few hours I was very excited, it seemed I had stumbled upon an honest, logical and plausable documentation of extraterrestrial life. However, after looking through this gallery, I am dissapointed. Most of these photo's are clearly fake. Not only that, it appears that little effort has been made to make them appear real. The "laser gun" pictures are an absolute joke; thats just a woman wrapped in tin-foil holding something that looks like its made out of bits of rubbish. The barrel of the "weapon" isn't even straight..

You have some good ideas here, and some great attitudes in regards to the preservation and advancement of human life on earth, but after looking at these pictures I cannot do anything but discredit everything else I have read.

I would consider it an honour for you or a member of your forum to respond to what I've just written. Please e-mail me on benjamin.collier@northumbria.ac.uk

Regards, Ben.

--DrBoogy 22:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Jamesm said ...

Hi Ben,

Thanks for voicing your opinion. You say most of the photos appear fake. Please give us one example because I'd like to discuss it further with you.

The laser gun looks straight along the barrel to me.

The woman holding it, called Alena, is wearing a suit that is supposedly unmatched by any known existing suit on Earth. The original investigators (professional ones) even searched throughout the shops of Switzerland for a suit just like it but didnt find one. It does look metallic, sure, but where can you get tin foil of that rusty colour and how easy would it be to make a suit out of such material?

Besides, aren't you judging a book (the Meier Case) by its cover (the photos)? And have you read all of the available evidence before making up your mind?

Looking forward to your response.



--Jamesm 23:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

RossTarik said ...

Who is Dejan? Or How accurate are the portraits of Semjase, Asket and or Florena

--RossTarik 19:25, 30 April 2011 (BST)

Jamesm said ...

Only Billy would know how accurate they are, except perhaps Brunhilde Koye who saw Ptaah once.

--Jamesm 22:13, 30 April 2011 (BST)