Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Billy Meier 'Hoax' Exposed? The Wedding Cake UFO Controversy"

From Future Of Mankind
(Comment provided by CriticalThinker - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
--[[User:CriticalThinker|CriticalThinker]] 14:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 
--[[User:CriticalThinker|CriticalThinker]] 14:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
</div>
 +
== Jamesm said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
CriticalThinker, if you were in the CIA, and your job was to preserve the power structure of the US government, and you discovered that everything in the Meier Case was true, then would there be anything you wouldnt do to taint the evidence. I think they may very well have had a hand in replacing some of Meier's photos with forgeries. But that video has several illogical claims within it too. Just because a beamship (UFO to you) looks a little like a bin lid doesnt mean it was a bin lid. Besides that bin lid in the video isnt slanted at the sides but the beamship is.
 +
 +
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 01:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 01:25, 20 February 2011

Comments on The Billy Meier 'Hoax' Exposed? The Wedding Cake UFO Controversy <comments />


Mark said ...

We could duplicate that in probably a million years from now when we all become trekkies.:)Spiritual evolution first. I think that ship was discontinued due to miscalculation of atmospheric imbalance which caused the cake to crumble thus became extinct or discontinued from what I've read. If we design a ship on Earth let's make sure it can do some of those manuevers like a drunk driver like those ships of the Pleiadians can.

--Mark 21:26, 18 April 2010 (BST)

Daniel said ...

To be fair however, at a first glance by a trained photographic eye these photos have some strange depth of field. Moreover the ships design may contribute to the object appearing out of perspective. It may also remind the viewer of various household items. But as one looks more deeply into the image, and beyond the image, it becomes clearer that if they are models then they are vast. On top of that if one does the 'homework' its clear Billy isnt capable of such vast models and huge supports/cranes. They are within the scene and show no evidence atall of superimposition when analyzed. Dan.

--Daniel 21:45, 19 April 2010 (BST)

CriticalThinker said ...

Really unconvincing photos!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41Y1TSNLj4c

--CriticalThinker 14:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Jamesm said ...

CriticalThinker, if you were in the CIA, and your job was to preserve the power structure of the US government, and you discovered that everything in the Meier Case was true, then would there be anything you wouldnt do to taint the evidence. I think they may very well have had a hand in replacing some of Meier's photos with forgeries. But that video has several illogical claims within it too. Just because a beamship (UFO to you) looks a little like a bin lid doesnt mean it was a bin lid. Besides that bin lid in the video isnt slanted at the sides but the beamship is.

--Jamesm 01:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)