Talk:Contact Report 215

From Future Of Mankind
Revision as of 04:00, 17 March 2013 by Cat (talk | contribs) (Comment provided by Cat - via ArticleComments extension)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Comments on Contact Report 215 <comments />

Sarah said ...

Starting to sound like Europe would be the better country to live. Better a slightly damaged country, than no country...I guess? Although ideally we can avoid this too if we can.

--Sarah 10:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Markvd said ...

A world should not need specific areas to traverse, if the leaders were genuine in there intent and development of each country all places should be at a balanced state. Unfortunately if there is any form of chaos or incorrectiness you will see that bad economy, overpopulation, bad weather prevail as it currently is over all of humanity. Only we can change our course stop daydreaming of some wonderouse miracle that shall never come, if there is a miracle to happen we will make it happen by eliminating all bad habits and capability for those that have no morals to step down from atop there positions which they truly do not deserve. :)

--Markvd 19:20, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Bigfoot said ...

I would rather live on that mountain where Gabriel appears from the heavens to sit and watch the destruction.

--Bigfoot 05:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Cat said ...

Well batten down the hatches everyone cos Pope Benedict has resigned!! It's going to be a very rough ride.

--Cat (talk), 17:17, 11 February 2013 (GMT)

Zameen said ...

This is crazy! Is the Cardinal from Ghana whose name is Peter, going to be named? If so, is he merely an interim replacement for the Peter of Rome? Has the church Acknowledged the Henoch prophecies? Is my hair on fire? Still, at this point contact #215 is still rather vague during this moment in time. I suppose we shall see.

--Zameen (talk), Orlando, fl., 23:09, 12 February 2013 (GMT)

Jamesm said ...

Dont forget that they might deliberately choose someone called Peter because they want to make the prophecy of Saint Malachy to be considered more valid than it currently is and therefore make people irrationally believe that the Christian religions must also be true even though there are other possible explanations and the vision of Saint Malachy supposedly has its failures as well as successes.

--Jamesm (talk), 23:28, 13 February 2013 (GMT)

Cat said ...

Here's the ancient prophecy of St Malachy from Wikipedia....

Petrus Romanus In recent times, some interpreters of prophetic literature have drawn attention to the prophecies due to their imminent conclusion; if the list of descriptions is matched on a one-to-one basis to the list of historic popes since the prophecies' publication, the currently retiring pope, Benedict XVI (2005-2013), would correspond to the second last of the papal descriptions, Gloria olivae (the glory of the olive).[4] The last prophecy predicts the Apocalypse. The longest and final motto reads: In persecutione extrema S.R.E. sedebit. Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oves in multis tribulationibus, quibus transactis civitas septicollis diruetur, & judex tremedus judicabit populum suum. Finis. This may be translated into English as: In the extreme persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit [i.e., as bishop]. Peter the Roman, who will pasture his sheep in many tribulations, and when these things are finished, the city of seven hills [i.e. Rome] will be destroyed, and the terrible judge will judge his people. The End. In the Lignum Vitae, the line In persecutione extrema S.R.E. sedebit. forms a separate sentence and paragraph of its own, and it is unclear whether it is grammatically related to Gloria olivae which precedes it, or to Petrus Romanus, which follows it. Several historians and interpreters of the prophecies note that they leaves open the possibility of unlisted popes between "the glory of the olive" and the final pope, "Peter the Roman."[1][2]

It could well be "The Black Pope" which in itself has always conjured up negative energies. It could be someone from left field, throw us all off course.

--Cat (talk), 05:48, 14 February 2013 (GMT)

Cat said ...

So now that we don't have a Pontinfex Maximum by the name of Petrus Romanus, what does that hold for our future? There was no indication whatsoever of what the alternative holds. All we were given was the terrible outcome under Romanus' reign - now that's not happening, what? Peace on earth? Wish the Plejarans/Henoch had been clear lol!!

--Cat (talk), 05:00, 17 March 2013 (CET)