|
|
| (86 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Editors comments. Click add topic
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Thank you Stevel ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Hello, nice to meet you Stevel. This is good work I have seen. Thank you very much Stevel for your efforts, they really will be valued by many, and you have identified many areas I didn't know about.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | You notice I placed anchor points, added links to the contact report number and linked some of the subjects to the Meier encyclopia. Has this been ok with you?, I thought I ought to ask before assuming any further having only done A so far. To me this makes the index more appealing to be regularly used by the readers of the website because they can click and click and the experience flows better if they don't have to then bring up a new tab manually and then remember the number and find the information they were looking for. But I was going to let it settle before I linked everything. Let me know.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I will step back and allow you the space necessary to make all the various evaluations, ...for now, we speak again later.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Again great work, thank you so much I really enjoy reading.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Daniel.
| |
| − | ----
| |
| − | Hello Daniel. Nice to meet you too, although I think we have replied to each other's comments on here in the past unless there are several Daniels. My name is Stephan Lane.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thank you very much for contributing to the index. It is much appreciated and in fact a relief for me as I didn't relish the prospect of doing all of that myself. What you have done is exactly what I had envisaged, so be my guest and continue. This is the first time I have created/edited Wiki pages so it started out as a mess but is now looking good. If you find any mistakes or index entries that are inappropriate in some way, feel free to modify/delete them.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | My hope for this index is to not only provide another means of finding information that can sometimes be difficult to pin down with one or two search words, but to also give folk an idea of the enormity of Billy's contacts simply by browsing through.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Best regards.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Steve.
| |
| − | ----
| |
| − | Good. Thank you Steve, please continue with the valuable work. I remember, now I think about it, its good to be with you.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | You're familiar with the MHRA style guide for indexing.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Its a good way of assessing the enormity of the works. And you have presented it beautifully.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | An [[Index]] is a good idea and a [[Contact Report Index]] is a good idea.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Daniel.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Moon (Earth) humans. ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Did you find the information about humans living on the moon, today, even if they are foreigners and even if they are in artificial environments and use the facilities as a base away from home and specifically for earth, the far side of the moon, and when these secrets will be revealed.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Please if you find this information along the way, please create an entry for it, I would appreciate it, thank you.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == I want to explain something about generations to you Stephen. ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Maybe you already know about these mechanisms, what seems to happen from generation to generation is that a certain fine sensitively perceived knowledge preexists somehow in the subsequent generation, but the veins are only that which are suitable in an evolutionary level sense, aligned with the ancestors who founded that knowledge already and originally.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | So what I am saying here is that, it's good that you are doing a good honest job and are being true to yourself, and it's good that you have positioned yourself to hand over that good work unconditionally, because without that unconditionality there is occasionally some other mechanism that seems to occur where it may also be destroyed in a future setting, that which individuals have worked hard on, I cannot particularly claim to know why it goes either way, it's good that you've positioned yourself for both theoretical receptions. To offer good work unconditionally, but also are prepared that it may be received dishonourably, and have accepted that if it pans out this way that there is a normal reason for it, there always is.
| |
